Coverage you can check.

The Secretary of State statewide-measures page explicitly lists four November 3, 2026 amendments. All four are present in the site; their individual Fair Ballot Commission explanations were read. This does not cover local amendments.

The 16 federal candidate names, office/district placement and party labels in the existing guide match the October 8 House Clerk nomination list. That is a dated federal nomination snapshot; this review did not establish a complete current state, judicial, local or write-in roster.

No local-question or local-candidate completeness is established. State and local races outside the federal snapshot still require official district-specific ballots.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

Official 2026 sample-ballot text identifies Measures 2 and 3. The complete statewide question inventory has not been independently verified.

The eight existing federal candidate names, office assignments and party labels were compared with the Clerk's October 8 snapshot: four U.S. Senate and four at-large U.S. House candidates. This does not certify later withdrawals, state offices, judicial retention, local contests, biographies or endorsements. Direct state-certified ballot access failed.

Local questions and local candidate rosters were not independently audited. An empty localQuestions list does not establish that a voter has no local questions or contests. Confirm an address-specific sample ballot with the responsible election office.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

Official November 3 candidate certification is available, but the complete 2026 referendum and sample-ballot inventory remains unverified. An empty question list does not establish that voters have no questions.

The official list contains six Delegate candidates plus territorial House candidates. Federal candidate identities were checked; this guide omits the territorial House roster. Candidate affiliation, incumbency and policy claims were not all reconciled.

Territorial House districts and local ballot assignment remain incomplete.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The official inventory and eight-page ballot-language document list 141, 142, 144, 316, 317, 318, 319 and 320; all eight existing question identities match.

Federal House records were compared with the October 8 House Clerk nomination list. The full 202-name state and federal roster, including all legislative assignments, has not been independently reconciled.

Local questions and local candidate rosters were not independently audited. An empty localQuestions list does not establish that a voter has no local questions or contests. Confirm an address-specific sample ballot with the responsible election office.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

Four certified statewide November issues, 1–4, match the dataset. The Secretary of State separately states that no citizen initiatives will appear in 2026. Legislative measures enacted in 2025 are correctly assigned to the 2026 election.

All 13 existing federal candidate names were found in the House Clerk’s October 8, 2026 nomination roster; office, district and party were compared for the federal contests. This verifies that dated federal roster snapshot only. State executive, legislative, judicial and local candidates are not covered by this check. Candidate biographies, policy claims, controversies and all endorsements were not verified.

Local coverage is not exhaustively verified. This audit covers the existing statewide-question inventory and the precisely stated candidate-roster scope; official county, municipal and district ballots remain necessary.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The official guide lists 14 statewide propositions: 1–5 and 37–45. All 14 existing identities, Yes/No meanings and official fiscal estimates were checked against the Legislative Analyst's analyses.

Governor entries and portions of the October 8 federal nomination list were checked. All 316 candidate names and state legislative assignments have not been independently reconciled. Published endorsements do not establish ballot eligibility.

Local questions and local candidate rosters were not independently audited. An empty localQuestions list does not establish that a voter has no local questions or contests. Confirm an address-specific sample ballot with the responsible election office.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

Fourteen statewide measures match the Blue Book. Its separate Front Range passenger-rail question is district-specific.

The official federal and statewide candidate listings were reviewed. All 246 candidate records and legislative district assignments have not been independently reconciled. Complete roster and profile verification remain unknown.

Local coverage is not exhaustively verified. This audit covers the existing statewide-question inventory and the precisely stated candidate-roster scope; official county, municipal and district ballots remain necessary.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The current official voter guide and complete Andover and Avon official November ballots were inspected. Those complete state ballots contain no statewide referendum; municipal questions vary and require separate town ballots. This is a statewide inventory conclusion, not proof that no local question exists.

Official voter-guide roster pages resolve House 14, 21 and 31 entries. House 14: Harrison Amadasun (Democratic/United Community) and Tom Delnicki (Republican/Independent); House 21: Mike Demicco (Democratic/Working Families/Independent) and Gary Palumbo (Republican); House 31: Jill Barry (Republican/Independent) and Moise “Moses” Carelus (Democratic/Working Families). Direct Glastonbury November ballot was not linked from the inspected state index and the town election page returned an access failure. The guide is official roster evidence; it does not verify every candidate profile. House districts 14, 21 and 31 are now reconciled with the official state voter guide; later local ballot corrections remain unknown.

The town-ballot index is rolling and incomplete. Andover and Avon were checked; other local questions and all ballot-style assignments remain unverified in this pass.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

Complete official sample ballots in New Castle (01-01), Sussex (04-01), and Kent (11-05) contain candidate contests without statewide questions. The zero statewide-question finding is checked against actual ballots; it does not certify every special/local election.

Federal names were checked on official ballots. Statewide Attorney General, Auditor and Treasurer contests are on those ballots but absent from this guide; legislative and county contests are also incomplete.

All three counties have official sample-ballot coverage, but this guide does not contain all legislative/county offices or complete address-to-ballot mapping.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The official November 2026 voter guide lists Initiative Measure 86 as the districtwide ballot measure and provides ward sample ballots. This is a complete districtwide initiative inventory, not a complete candidate-performance review.

This guide includes the federal Delegate contest. Mayor, Council, Attorney General, State Board of Education, shadow offices and Advisory Neighborhood Commission coverage remain incomplete. The official guide applies ranked-choice voting to eligible contests with at least three candidates, including the four-candidate Delegate race.

The guide supplies ward ballots but omits ANC candidate names from its sample pages; official ANC resources and exact single-member-district assignment remain necessary.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The official constitutional-amendment booklet contains exactly three November 3, 2026 questions. All three are in the guide. This finding does not cover local charter amendments, bonds or referendums.

The three U.S. Senate names and parties and selected U.S. House entries were compared with the official candidate list. All 370 state, federal, legislative and judicial candidate records have not been independently reconciled. Later withdrawals and complete local coverage remain unknown.

Local questions and all county/municipal candidates are not comprehensively included or verified; the state source directs county and municipal races to local Supervisors of Elections.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The official 2026 constitutional-amendment booklet lists exactly three statewide questions, all present in the guide. Their text and explanations were read; no claim is made about completeness of local referendum coverage.

The official state candidate list has not been fully compared with the 463 names in this guide. Current completeness, district assignments and write-in coverage remain unknown.

The statewide booklet does not establish every county, city, school or special-district ballot. Local questions and candidates still require the relevant county official sample ballot.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

Both sides of the GEC-linked November 3, 2026 sample ballot were read. They contain candidate contests and no referendum or ballot question. This verifies the published territorywide sample; it does not guarantee complete local address assignment.

Delegate candidates James Moylan and Alicia Limtiaco were checked. The sample also includes governor/lieutenant-governor, Legislature, Attorney General, utilities commission and education offices not fully represented in this guide.

Exact municipal or other address-specific ballot coverage is not certified. The GEC information page intermittently timed out; the linked official two-page specimen was retrieved and examined.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The Office of Elections lists exactly two proposed constitutional amendments for November 3, 2026; both existing question identities and text were checked.

All six existing U.S. House candidates and their two district assignments were checked against the Clerk's October 8 federal nominations list. This is a federal-roster check only; state and county candidates, write-in rules, biographies and post-snapshot changes are not certified.

Local questions and local candidate rosters were not independently audited. An empty localQuestions list does not establish that a voter has no local questions or contests. Confirm an address-specific sample ballot with the responsible election office.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

Both constitutional resolutions, Proposition 1 and the six-choice nonbinding firearm advisory question match the official general-election inventory.

All 13 existing federal candidate names were found in the House Clerk’s October 8, 2026 nomination roster; office, district and party were compared for the federal contests. This verifies that dated federal roster snapshot only. State executive, legislative, judicial and local candidates are not covered by this check. Candidate biographies, policy claims, controversies and all endorsements were not verified.

Local coverage is not exhaustively verified. This audit covers the existing statewide-question inventory and the precisely stated candidate-roster scope; official county, municipal and district ballots remain necessary.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

No statewide policy question appears in the certified Cumberland County and Rockford specimens inspected. That local evidence does not prove statewide absence. The state voter guide returned an access error. Complete statewide inventory remains unknown.

The October 8 House Clerk publication was checked for Illinois federal offices and the Senate entries. The site has federal contests only. Official local specimens contain statewide executive, legislative and judicial contests absent from that federal-only dataset; all 39 included candidate names were not individually reconciled. Candidate biographies, policy positions, controversies, and each candidate’s complete endorsement history were not verified by this roster review. An unrecorded endorsement means unknown, not no endorsements.

A statewide question inventory does not establish the complete local ballot for every address. Municipal, county, school, special-district, judicial, write-in and precinct assignment details require the current local election authority’s sample ballot; this review did not audit all local ballots or address matching.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The Indiana Election Division explicitly says all counties have two constitutional public questions at the November 3 general election. Both are represented in the site. Separate local questions are outside this inventory.

The official federal nominations publication is available for the nine House contests. This audit did not reconcile every included candidate or establish a complete Indiana state/local roster; the existing dataset is federal-only. Candidate biographies, policy positions, controversies, and each candidate’s complete endorsement history were not verified by this roster review. An unrecorded endorsement means unknown, not no endorsements.

A statewide question inventory does not establish the complete local ballot for every address. Municipal, county, school, special-district, judicial, write-in and precinct assignment details require the current local election authority’s sample ballot; this review did not audit all local ballots or address matching.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

Woodbury County published full official language for statewide Public Measure 1. This confirms the listed measure but the reviewed sources do not establish an exhaustive certified statewide inventory; do not assert that it is the only measure statewide.

The Secretary of State general-election page still links the August 19 candidate-list PDF. Statewide and federal entries on its first two pages were inspected. The 243 included candidate records and later amendments/withdrawals were not fully reconciled; the state page excludes county races from that list. Candidate biographies, policy positions, controversies, and each candidate’s complete endorsement history were not verified by this roster review. An unrecorded endorsement means unknown, not no endorsements.

A statewide question inventory does not establish the complete local ballot for every address. Municipal, county, school, special-district, judicial, write-in and precinct assignment details require the current local election authority’s sample ballot; this review did not audit all local ballots or address matching.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The Kansas Secretary of State’s proposed-amendments page identifies one constitutional amendment for November 3, 2026; the listed qualification-of-electors amendment matches it.

Both www and non-www versions of the official candidate-list endpoint returned HTTP 403. This audit therefore cannot verify the included 253-candidate Kansas roster. The federal Clerk publication provides a narrower alternative, but a complete record-by-record comparison was not performed. Candidate biographies, policy positions, controversies, and each candidate’s complete endorsement history were not verified by this roster review. An unrecorded endorsement means unknown, not no endorsements.

A statewide question inventory does not establish the complete local ballot for every address. Municipal, county, school, special-district, judicial, write-in and precinct assignment details require the current local election authority’s sample ballot; this review did not audit all local ballots or address matching.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The Secretary of State constitutional-amendments page publishes one 2026 question, Amendment 1, and its full proposed Section 77. The site includes that question.

The October 8 federal nominations snapshot was reconciled with Kentucky’s current Secretary of State write-in filings. Four source-listed federal write-ins have been added. This does not establish complete state, judicial or local candidate coverage. Policy and controversy profiles remain unknown unless separately reviewed.

Local and state-office ballot completeness is not established. Use the official local sample ballot for races beyond the federal roster.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The Secretary of State lists ten statewide constitutional amendments for November, including amendments enabling later local exemptions or options. Questions from the separate May election are excluded.

All 41 existing federal candidate names were found in the House Clerk’s October 8, 2026 nomination roster; office, district and party were compared for the federal contests. This verifies that dated federal roster snapshot only. State executive, legislative, judicial and local candidates are not covered by this check. Candidate biographies, policy claims, controversies and all endorsements were not verified. House contests on November 3 use Louisiana’s open-primary system and may require a December 12 runoff; the Senate contest is a general election.

Local coverage is not exhaustively verified. This audit covers the existing statewide-question inventory and the precisely stated candidate-roster scope; official county, municipal and district ballots remain necessary.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

Both sides of the current official State of Maine Winthrop/Readfield sample ballot were retrieved and contain candidate contests and no statewide referendum. Auburn’s clerk also describes its November ballot as one double-sided state ballot, with no city ballot. The school-sports initiative is excluded following the July 10 final Supreme Judicial Court decision affirming invalidation, not treated as a pending May lawsuit.

The official Winthrop/Readfield sample ballot confirms its federal, statewide and district contests, including Collins/Jackson for Senate, Dunlap/LePage for House 2 and Bennett/Charles/Pingree for governor. Complete statewide legislative and write-in coverage remains unknown.

Winthrop/Readfield state ballot and Auburn clerk information were inspected. This is not an all-municipality local referendum or profile audit.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The State Board of Elections final inventory lists exactly three statewide amendments, Questions 1, 2 and 3. Its additional county/local questions establish that statewide completeness does not imply local completeness.

This guide contains federal candidates but omits the complete statewide executive, legislative, judicial and local roster. Policy/controversy entries and all incumbent markers were not individually checked in this jurisdiction audit.

Official county question inventory exists but has not been fully included or analyzed. A resolved congressional district is not a complete state/local ballot match.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The secretary explicitly enumerates nine binding statewide questions. Each of the nine official summary/full-text/fiscal pages was read; no prior-year inventory was substituted.

The current official 2026 state-election list was accessed, including federal and statewide contests. Every legislative/county candidate row and every individual profile was not independently compared. The official list is a roster source, not verification of policy or controversy descriptions.

Westport and Berkley statewide measures and three local cannabis licensees were checked. A complete all-municipality local question/candidate inventory was not established.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The Secretary of State’s certified November ballot-questions document contains exactly Proposals 2026-1 and 2026-2; both are present.

The live official general-election report was checked for governor, secretary of state, attorney general, U.S. Senate, congressional districts and disqualification flags. The included 413 candidates were not all individually reconciled. The official source includes Supreme Court and education-board contests omitted from the site’s included coverage. Four explicit party convention endorsements are separately recorded. Candidate biographies, policy positions, controversies, and each candidate’s complete endorsement history were not verified by this roster review. An unrecorded endorsement means unknown, not no endorsements.

A statewide question inventory does not establish the complete local ballot for every address. Municipal, county, school, special-district, judicial, write-in and precinct assignment details require the current local election authority’s sample ballot; this review did not audit all local ballots or address matching.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The Secretary of State identifies one constitutional amendment for the November 3, 2026 election. Its title and text match the school-fund question in the site.

The official candidate finder confirms the November general-election scope, separate local lists and removal of withdrawn candidates. Its dynamic roster/download rows were not fully retrieved, so the 420 included candidate records are not certified by this audit. Current DFL endorsement evidence is independently recorded, not used as a substitute for ballot qualification. Candidate biographies, policy positions, controversies, and each candidate’s complete endorsement history were not verified by this roster review. An unrecorded endorsement means unknown, not no endorsements.

A statewide question inventory does not establish the complete local ballot for every address. Municipal, county, school, special-district, judicial, write-in and precinct assignment details require the current local election authority’s sample ballot; this review did not audit all local ballots or address matching.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The Secretary of State 12-page November 3 composite sample ballot was read through its end. It contains federal, legislative special-election and judicial contests, with no statewide amendment or referendum section or question. This supports zero statewide questions in the published composite, not an assertion that there are no local questions anywhere.

All 15 federal names, parties and congressional districts on the first page of the official September 9 composite ballot match the existing guide. The site federal-only roster omits the state House District 70 and 77 special elections, District Attorney District 7 and judicial contests in the same official document. Current late substitutions and write-in filing completeness were not separately established.

Local ballot questions and local candidate coverage are not established. The official composite contains many judicial races not included in the guide.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The Secretary of State separates August from November questions and certifies five November 3 items: Amendments 3, 6, 7, 8 and Proposition A. All five are present.

The certified candidate PDF was checked for statewide auditor and federal candidate entries. The site’s eight-contest federal-only roster omits state auditor, state legislature, judicial and other contests appearing in the certification. The state-auditor contest is absent from the site; this audit is not a complete candidate import or policy review. Candidate biographies, policy positions, controversies, and each candidate’s complete endorsement history were not verified by this roster review. An unrecorded endorsement means unknown, not no endorsements.

A statewide question inventory does not establish the complete local ballot for every address. Municipal, county, school, special-district, judicial, write-in and precinct assignment details require the current local election authority’s sample ballot; this review did not audit all local ballots or address matching.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The Secretary of State qualified list contains CI-132, CI-133 and I-194. Other circulated or submitted proposals on the page are not certified November measures.

The official portal reports 143 offices and 272 candidates; the application has 253 records across a narrower contest scope. Federal Senate and both House district listings were read and compared. Only the first paginated portal page was extracted, so state-legislative records were not fully reconciled. Judicial and public-service-commission coverage requires separate checking.

Local coverage is not exhaustively verified. This audit covers the existing statewide-question inventory and the precisely stated candidate-roster scope; official county, municipal and district ballots remain necessary.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The Secretary of State lists four November statewide measures: LR19CA and Initiatives 440, 441 and 442. All four are represented.

The House Clerk publication’s Nebraska federal entries and the state’s September 11 final statewide filing list were inspected. The site has only four federal contests and omits governor and other statewide, unicameral, judicial and local offices. Federal ballot identity does not verify biographies, controversies or every final change. Candidate biographies, policy positions, controversies, and each candidate’s complete endorsement history were not verified by this roster review. An unrecorded endorsement means unknown, not no endorsements.

A statewide question inventory does not establish the complete local ballot for every address. Municipal, county, school, special-district, judicial, write-in and precinct assignment details require the current local election authority’s sample ballot; this review did not audit all local ballots or address matching.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The official 2026 statewide guide lists Questions 6 and 7, both second votes on amendments approved in 2024. This inventory does not establish local ballot completeness.

All 14 existing U.S. House candidate names, party labels and four district assignments were compared with the Clerk's October 8 nominations list. Statewide, state legislative, judicial and local rosters and candidate policy biographies were not independently certified.

Local questions and local candidate rosters were not independently audited. An empty localQuestions list does not establish that a voter has no local questions or contests. Confirm an address-specific sample ballot with the responsible election office.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The official Pelham ballot and adopted CACR 13 establish one statewide constitutional amendment, Question 1. Separately, RSA 32:5-i requires a school tax and administrative-cap question in every town and ward. Adoption is tallied locally across each school district and SAU.

The complete official Pelham ballot was retrieved and its listed candidates compared with the local guide. The central September 17 general-election candidate PDF and state election-details page returned access errors, so the statewide roster was not independently rechecked row by row.

Pelham statutory Question 2 text and mechanics were checked against RSA 32:5-i. No verified Pelham savings forecast or complete all-town fiscal model is available. The existing litigation link was reporting; the current court disposition was not independently verified from a court source.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

All 44 pages of Burlington County official 2026 sample ballots were inspected for question sections. They contain local school, fire-district and municipal questions and no statewide public question. The verified zero is statewide only.

This guide includes Senate and House candidates. County, municipal, school and fire-district rosters remain incomplete. The official September 4 House list confirms Ryan Michael Kelly’s name and the separate ballot designation “Affordability, Accountability, People.”

This guide includes a Burlington City open-space entry. The official county specimen collection contains additional school, fire-district and municipal questions, including Bordentown school borrowing. Those other local inventories, analyses and individual address assignments remain incomplete.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The certified ballot contains four constitutional amendments and three general-obligation bond questions; all seven existing records match.

All 8 existing federal candidate names were found in the House Clerk’s October 8, 2026 nomination roster; office, district and party were compared for the federal contests. This verifies that dated federal roster snapshot only. State executive, legislative, judicial and local candidates are not covered by this check. Candidate biographies, policy claims, controversies and all endorsements were not verified.

Local coverage is not exhaustively verified. This audit covers the existing statewide-question inventory and the precisely stated candidate-roster scope; official county, municipal and district ballots remain necessary.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The complete statewide proposition inventory remains unverified. NYC Votes lists five New York City Charter proposals; those local questions do not establish whether the state has statewide propositions.

The 136-page certification covers statewide executive offices, Congress, State Senate and Assembly, but all rows and local/judicial contests were not individually reconciled. Verified correction in contest ny-2026-state-house-96: Patrick Carroll is one candidate on Democratic and Working Families lines. Merge the spurious Patrick Carroll Ste entry; Ste starts the next page and is not his name. Brett L. Yagel remains Republican/Conservative. See printed pages 97–98.

Five NYC local charter proposals are listed. Their complete fiscal/beneficiary analysis and inventories in all other municipalities remain incomplete. Exact local ballot assignment is not certified by this audit.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The State Board of Elections lists three November 3 constitutional amendments, all included here. The official list identifies them by title rather than question number.

All 366 candidate names and party labels in this guide were found in the official November 3 candidate list. Every office and district assignment, local and write-in completeness, incumbency and candidate profile have not been independently verified.

The guide contains 51 local-question records, but those individual questions, local fiscal claims and address-to-jurisdiction assignments were not reverified in this statewide pass. The state candidate CSV also contains local offices beyond the guide.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The complete November measure guide lists constitutional Measures 1 and 2. Measures from other election dates or years were excluded.

All 4 existing federal candidate names were found in the House Clerk’s October 8, 2026 nomination roster; office, district and party were compared for the federal contests. This verifies that dated federal roster snapshot only. State executive, legislative, judicial and local candidates are not covered by this check. Candidate biographies, policy claims, controversies and all endorsements were not verified.

Local coverage is not exhaustively verified. This audit covers the existing statewide-question inventory and the precisely stated candidate-roster scope; official county, municipal and district ballots remain necessary.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The 14-page CEC specimen file was inspected: precinct pages contain Alexandro Cruz Castro retention, and the final page contains the constitutional-convention question. The official certified-candidate page also identifies the justice. These are separate decisions.

The official certification contains 74 candidate records across territorial and municipal offices. This guide includes the two Delegate candidates and a separate justice-retention question. Other candidate coverage is incomplete. Galvin Sablan Deleon Guerrero is listed as Independent even though the territorial Democratic Party endorses him.

Precinct specimens exist, but most territorial/local candidates and candidate histories remain absent from this guide.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The Secretary of State’s November general-election ballot directive identifies one statewide issue, Issue 3, and the certified issue report confirms it.

The statewide ticket and candidate names in Directive 2026-45 were inspected, including governor, attorney general, auditor, secretary of state, treasurer, Supreme Court and U.S. Senate. The directive also includes qualified write-ins, which were not fully reconciled with the site. The included legislative/local selection is limited to selected counties rather than a complete statewide legislative roster. Candidate biographies, policy positions, controversies, and each candidate’s complete endorsement history were not verified by this roster review. An unrecorded endorsement means unknown, not no endorsements.

A statewide question inventory does not establish the complete local ballot for every address. Municipal, county, school, special-district, judicial, write-in and precinct assignment details require the current local election authority’s sample ballot; this review did not audit all local ballots or address matching.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The Election Board lists SQ 845 and SQ 847 for November 3. SQ 847’s final certified title supersedes the earlier legislative proposal for an August election.

All 19 existing federal candidate names were found in the House Clerk’s October 8, 2026 nomination roster; office, district and party were compared for the federal contests. This verifies that dated federal roster snapshot only. State executive, legislative, judicial and local candidates are not covered by this check. Candidate biographies, policy claims, controversies and all endorsements were not verified.

Local coverage is not exhaustively verified. This audit covers the existing statewide-question inventory and the precisely stated candidate-roster scope; official county, municipal and district ballots remain necessary.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The Secretary of State explicitly states that there are no statewide ballot measures for the November 3, 2026 general election. The existing empty statewide question list is therefore verified. This does not cover May measures or local questions.

All 18 existing federal candidate names and office/district assignments were checked against the Clerk's October 8 nominations list: four U.S. Senate and 14 U.S. House candidates across six districts. Governor, state legislative, judicial and local rosters and policy biographies remain outside this check.

Local questions and local candidate rosters were not independently audited. An empty localQuestions list does not establish that a voter has no local questions or contests. Confirm an address-specific sample ballot with the responsible election office.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The complete official Philadelphia sample ballot contains no statewide question and lists two local Charter questions. The statewide finding is based on those election records; the Charter questions apply locally.

Governor tickets and congressional races are present; state legislative coverage is limited to selected counties. All sixteen PA House entries with asterisk-prefixed parties were checked against Clerk PDF page 26 (printed page 24) and its page 3 key: remove the asterisk from party and set incumbent true. The key distinguishes current incumbents from dagger-marked prior service. Other candidate fields and complete local rosters remain unverified.

This guide has no Philadelphia local questions despite the official two-question charter document. County and municipality inventories and address assignment remain incomplete.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The CEE 2028 procurement document states that regular general elections occur every four years and that the next is November 7, 2028. November 3, 2026 is not Puerto Rico regular general-election day. This does not establish that no special election, referendum or local event can occur in 2026.

A regular November 3, 2026 Puerto Rico general-election candidate roster is not applicable. Special-event candidacies remain unverified.

Puerto Rico has no regular general election on the mainland’s November 3, 2026 schedule. Special-election and municipal coverage requires a separately verified official calendar.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The 2026 official handbook enumerates five statewide questions; all five also appear on the complete November 3 Portsmouth 2701 ballot. This verifies the statewide inventory, not every municipal question or ballot style.

The official Portsmouth precinct 2701 ballot was checked for federal, statewide, Senate 11, House 69, Town Council and School Committee contests. Other Portsmouth precincts and other Rhode Island ballot styles have not been independently rechecked. Differences between ballot names and longer profile names do not verify a biography.

Portsmouth Questions 6–7 and Cranston Questions 6–11 and their published fiscal models were checked. Tiverton Questions 6–18 and all other local inventories were not reverified in this review.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The official public referendum search for election 22596 (November 3, 2026) was submitted with All groups and All political-party filters. The response contains 42 local-question rows and zero statewide-constitutional-amendment rows. Zero statewide questions is verified against that complete returned inventory; the 42 local rows are not in the current guide.

The 22 existing federal names, parties and office/district placements match the October 8 House Clerk federal nomination snapshot. The current state candidate portal is available, but this pass did not fully compare state legislative, local or write-in rosters. A dated federal nomination snapshot is not all ballot candidates.

42 official local referendum records are included with source wording. Their full fiscal and beneficiary analysis, exact electorate and address applicability remain unknown. The administering county alone does not establish who votes on a measure.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The official 2026 pamphlet lists constitutional amendments I, J, K and L, matching the four statewide questions in this report.

All 5 existing federal candidate names were found in the House Clerk’s October 8, 2026 nomination roster; office, district and party were compared for the federal contests. This verifies that dated federal roster snapshot only. State executive, legislative, judicial and local candidates are not covered by this check. Candidate biographies, policy claims, controversies and all endorsements were not verified.

Local coverage is not exhaustively verified. This audit covers the existing statewide-question inventory and the precisely stated candidate-roster scope; official county, municipal and district ballots remain necessary.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

Official county legal notices and election-commission explanations both reproduce exactly three statewide November 3 amendments, in the same order as the guide. The state SOS listing was also located, but direct page access returned 403; the complete official county notices supplied the substantive text.

The 56 federal candidate entries in the guide match names, parties and district placement in the October 8 House Clerk nomination snapshot. Complete current state legislative, judicial, local and write-in rosters were not established.

Statewide amendment verification does not establish all Tennessee county, municipal or special-district ballots. No complete local collection was audited.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The official November sample ballot and certification records contain no statewide questions. The State Law Library identifies 2026 propositions as local county and city measures. Local questions may still appear on your ballot.

The official nomination and write-in certifications and sample ballot were retrieved. The federal Senate and statewide executive sample-ballot names were read, but all 467 existing records, district contests, late substitutions and write-ins were not individually reconciled. The hub also lists separate November special elections for SD22 and HD93. Judiciary, school-board and local completeness is not certified.

Local coverage is not exhaustively verified. This audit covers the existing statewide-question inventory and the precisely stated candidate-roster scope; official county, municipal and district ballots remain necessary.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

Complete two-sided official sample ballots for both St. Croix and St. Thomas/St. John contain candidate contests and no ballot questions. The no-question finding is based on both district specimens.

Federal Delegate candidates Janelle Sarauw and Shelley Moorhead were checked. Governor tickets, Legislature, education and elections-board contests appear on the official ballots but are not fully represented in this guide.

Both district ballot specimens were checked. Complete local candidate analysis and exact district/address assignment remain incomplete.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The official certification lists constitutional amendments A and B and explicitly states that no statewide citizen propositions qualified. Both amendments match the dataset.

All 19 existing federal candidate names were found in the House Clerk’s October 8, 2026 nomination roster; office, district and party were compared for the federal contests. This verifies that dated federal roster snapshot only. State executive, legislative, judicial and local candidates are not covered by this check. Candidate biographies, policy claims, controversies and all endorsements were not verified.

Local coverage is not exhaustively verified. This audit covers the existing statewide-question inventory and the precisely stated candidate-roster scope; official county, municipal and district ballots remain necessary.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The Legislature’s official publication explicitly lists two 2026 constitutional amendments, Proposals 3 and 4. The Secretary of State voter guide was also retrieved directly and confirms the same two and majority-vote rule.

The official Addison voter guide supplies federal and statewide candidate records. Other legislative and local ballot styles and the complete central roster have not been independently compared. Candidate statements in the guide are submitted by candidates, not independently fact-checked.

Statewide constitutional questions checked; local referendum completeness and municipality-specific fiscal models were not established.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The Department of Elections inventory has exactly three Statewide rows, Questions 1-3, all present in the guide. All three official explanations and proposed constitutional texts were read. The coverage-summary text describing the statewide inventory as incomplete conflicts with its inventoryVerified=true flag; statewide inventory can be marked verified while separate local/candidate/policy gaps remain explicit.

The official federal candidate page was read for selected entries, and both District 20 House of Delegates special-election candidates, Sonia Ruth Vasquez Luna and Nathaniel Nate Fritzen, were confirmed with parties and district in the all-offices list. The complete 40-name guide was not independently compared entry by entry in this pass, and the much larger local list remains outside that collection.

The guide has 64 local-question records. This pass confirmed their official inventory source exists but did not reverify each local question, fiscal figure or jurisdiction assignment. The official all-offices page includes many local candidates not covered by the 40-name guide.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The Secretary of State lists IP26-645, IL26-001 and IL26-638. The existing three-question statewide inventory matches. Each Attorney General explanation and OFM fiscal statement was reviewed; statutory details were checked where needed.

All 20 existing U.S. House candidate names and ten district assignments were checked against the Clerk's October 8 nominations list. This does not verify state legislative, judicial or local candidates, current-official biographies, policy positions or every endorsement.

Local questions and local candidate rosters were not independently audited. An empty localQuestions list does not establish that a voter has no local questions or contests. Confirm an address-specific sample ballot with the responsible election office.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The Secretary of State notice identifies Amendment 1 and reproduces its certified title and text; official November 3 Brooke County sample ballots show only that statewide amendment. The guide contains it. This does not establish absence of local questions in other counties.

The eight federal names, parties and office/district placement match the October 8 House Clerk nomination snapshot. The official Brooke County sample ballot additionally corroborates the Senate and House District 2 contests. State legislative, local, other county-specific and write-in completeness remain unverified.

The guide federal roster omits state legislative and local races visible even in the Brooke County sample ballots. County-specific measures and candidates require separate ballots.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The official Type C notice contains three statewide questions and explanations for the November election, corroborated by Kenosha County’s official races and referendums list. All three are present.

Kenosha County’s official list was checked for statewide, federal and its local legislative entries. The site’s 16 contests combine federal/statewide offices with only a Kenosha legislative subset. This is not a complete Wisconsin legislative or municipal roster; all 38 included names and later changes were not individually reconciled. Candidate biographies, policy positions, controversies, and each candidate’s complete endorsement history were not verified by this roster review. An unrecorded endorsement means unknown, not no endorsements.

A statewide question inventory does not establish the complete local ballot for every address. Municipal, county, school, special-district, judicial, write-in and precinct assignment details require the current local election authority’s sample ballot; this review did not audit all local ballots or address matching.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.

The Secretary of State statewide proposition document contains one initiative. The certified text and fiscal statement match the existing record; the earliest applicable tax year is 2027, despite an older date in petition text.

All 6 existing federal candidate names were found in the House Clerk’s October 8, 2026 nomination roster; office, district and party were compared for the federal contests. This verifies that dated federal roster snapshot only. State executive, legislative, judicial and local candidates are not covered by this check. Candidate biographies, policy claims, controversies and all endorsements were not verified.

Local coverage is not exhaustively verified. This audit covers the existing statewide-question inventory and the precisely stated candidate-roster scope; official county, municipal and district ballots remain necessary.

Endorsements: only explicit, sourced statements are shown. All other records say unknown.