BallotLedger

2026 ELECTION RESEARCH · FL

Florida ballot questions

Source review and research limits are shown for each question. An unknown detail is not treated as a fact.

Open the interactive report and district lookup →
STATEWIDE1Florida

Budget Stabilization Fund

Source review availableSee exactly what was checked

The fields listed below were checked against the linked sources on October 21, 2026. Future outcomes, final contract awards and individual tax bills are not established by this review.

Checked: Title, Summary, Yes vote, No vote, Beneficiaries, Fiscal estimate, Tradeoffs, Named organizations.

Unknown: Final outcomes, future contract awards and your individual tax bill are not established by a ballot authorization.

Raises the state reserve ceiling from 10% to 25% of the previous fiscal year’s net general-revenue collections. Normally requires an annual transfer of up to $750 million, with specified exceptions, and permits limited withdrawals for critical state needs.

YES

Adopts the larger reserve ceiling, transfer rule and additional withdrawal authority.

NO

Keeps the existing constitutional reserve rules, including the 10% ceiling.

Who benefits or is affected

The Florida Budget Stabilization Fund holds the transferred public revenue. The Legislature receives the specified transfer, withdrawal and suspension authority. The amendment makes no direct grant or payment to a company or household.

Costs and tradeoffs

This reallocates public money rather than authorizing a bond or a new tax. The annual transfer is the lesser of $750 million or the amount needed to reach the 25% ceiling. It is not a $750 million annual charge divided equally among voters.

The annual transfer moves general-revenue money into the reserve, subject to the stated exceptions. It does not create a bond.

Critical-needs withdrawals require two-thirds approval in each chamber, a separate bill, an initial reserve above 15% and a remaining balance of at least 10%.

A suspension for a critical need exceeding the required transfer requires two-thirds approval and may occur only once in five years.

Organizations named in the records

A named public institution, administrator or eligible applicant is not automatically a contract awardee. Future private awards are unknown unless a source identifies an executed award.

Published party positions

Democratic Party
oppose

Dolphin Democrats and Florida LGBTQ+ Democratic Caucus

Their joint 2026 general-election recommendation says Vote NO. This is a named Democratic organization/caucus position, not proof of a formal endorsement by the full Florida Democratic Party.

Published 2026-09-28 · Source checked 2026-10-21

Republican Party
support

Republican Party of Florida

Official state-party statement urges YES. It confirms support for Amendments 1 and 3 and reiterates its earlier endorsement of Amendment 2; the current recommendation covers all three.

Published 2026-09-14 · Source checked 2026-10-21

A position applies to the named organization, not every party member. Missing evidence does not establish neutrality. We do not infer a party’s position from its ideology or a legislator’s vote.

STATEWIDE2Florida

Exemption of Tangible Personal Property on Agricultural Land from Taxation

Source review availableSee exactly what was checked

The fields listed below were checked against the linked sources on October 21, 2026. Future outcomes, final contract awards and individual tax bills are not established by this review.

Checked: Title, Summary, Yes vote, No vote, Beneficiaries, Fiscal estimate, Tradeoffs.

Unknown: Named organizations.

Exempts qualifying tangible personal property used for agricultural production or agritourism, habitually on agricultural land and owned by its owner or leaseholder. It first applies to tax years beginning January 1, 2027.

YES

Creates the specified property-tax exemption.

NO

Leaves the existing constitutional property-tax exemptions in place.

Who benefits or is affected

Eligible agricultural landowners and leaseholders who own qualifying equipment or other taxable personal property benefit directly. It is not a general exemption for every household or every business. No named private recipient is specified.

Costs and tradeoffs

Eligible owners would owe less property tax. The foregone local revenue and an individual owner’s savings depend on qualifying taxable value and applicable tax rates; no verified statewide dollar estimate or uniform per-voter cost is included here.

The exemption is limited to property meeting the ownership, location and use requirements; it does not cover all property or every business.

Agritourism is included alongside agricultural production.

Individual savings depend on qualifying assessed value and applicable property-tax rates. The sources reviewed do not establish a uniform cost for other voters.

Organizations named in the records

Recipient names: unknown. No separately verified allocation or contract-award list is recorded for this question. This does not mean no recipients exist.

Published party positions

Democratic Party
oppose

Dolphin Democrats and Florida LGBTQ+ Democratic Caucus

Their joint 2026 general-election recommendation says Vote NO. This is a named Democratic organization/caucus position, not proof of a formal endorsement by the full Florida Democratic Party.

Published 2026-09-28 · Source checked 2026-10-21

Republican Party
support

Republican Party of Florida

Official state-party statement urges YES. It confirms support for Amendments 1 and 3 and reiterates its earlier endorsement of Amendment 2; the current recommendation covers all three.

Published 2026-09-14 · Source checked 2026-10-21

A position applies to the named organization, not every party member. Missing evidence does not establish neutrality. We do not infer a party’s position from its ideology or a legislator’s vote.

STATEWIDE3Florida

Increased Homestead Exemption; Lower Cap on Increases in Non-Homestead Property Assessments

Source review availableSee exactly what was checked

The fields listed below were checked against the linked sources on October 21, 2026. Future outcomes, final contract awards and individual tax bills are not established by this review.

Checked: Title, Summary, Yes vote, No vote, Beneficiaries, Fiscal estimate, Tradeoffs.

Unknown: Named organizations.

For non-school property taxes, raises the homestead exemption to $150,000 of assessed value in 2027 and $250,000 in 2028, indexed thereafter. Lowers the annual non-homestead assessment-growth cap from 10% to 5%, adds rules for larger local exemptions, and limits uses of county and municipal property-tax revenue.

YES

Adopts the exemption increases, lower assessment cap, local-exemption procedures and revenue-use rules, effective January 1, 2027.

NO

Keeps the current constitutional exemptions and assessment limits.

Who benefits or is affected

Qualifying homestead owners benefit directly. Non-homestead owners, including landlords and commercial owners, can benefit from the lower assessment cap. People who had not maintained a permanent Florida residence by December 31, 2026 receive the existing exemption when eligible; the larger exemption begins with their fifth year of exemption, subject to federal constitutional limits. Renters receive no direct homestead exemption.

Costs and tradeoffs

Official legislative staff estimate $4.95 billion less local non-school property-tax revenue in FY2027–28 and $8.78 billion less in FY2028–29. These are statewide estimates, not personal tax bills. Savings depend on taxable value, exemptions and future local rates. A $250,000 exemption is a reduction in taxable assessed value, not a $250,000 payment.

The larger homestead exemption applies to non-school property taxes. A reduction in taxable assessed value is not a cash payment.

The 5% non-homestead limit concerns assessment growth, not tax rates or the final tax bill.

The larger exemption begins with the fifth year of exemption for people subject to the new-resident limitation, subject to federal constitutional constraints.

Revenue-use rules include specified public purposes and other expenditures approved by local officials unless prohibited by general law. Future local rates and service decisions remain unknown.

Organizations named in the records

Recipient names: unknown. No separately verified allocation or contract-award list is recorded for this question. This does not mean no recipients exist.

Published party positions

Democratic Party
oppose

Dolphin Democrats and Florida LGBTQ+ Democratic Caucus

Their joint 2026 general-election recommendation says Vote NO. This is a named Democratic organization/caucus position, not proof of a formal endorsement by the full Florida Democratic Party.

Published 2026-09-28 · Source checked 2026-10-21

Republican Party
support

Republican Party of Florida

Official state-party statement urges YES. It confirms support for Amendments 1 and 3 and reiterates its earlier endorsement of Amendment 2; the current recommendation covers all three.

Published 2026-09-14 · Source checked 2026-10-21

A position applies to the named organization, not every party member. Missing evidence does not establish neutrality. We do not infer a party’s position from its ideology or a legislator’s vote.

Official election office · Coverage status · Reporting standards