BallotLedger

2026 ELECTION RESEARCH · UT

Utah ballot questions

Source review and research limits are shown for each question. An unknown detail is not treated as a fact.

Open the interactive report and district lookup →
STATEWIDE•Utah

Constitutional Amendment A

Change publication requirements for constitutional amendments

Source review availableSee exactly what was checked

The fields listed below were checked against the linked sources on October 21, 2026. Future outcomes, final contract awards and individual tax bills are not established by this review.

Checked: Title, Summary, Yes vote, No vote, Beneficiaries, Fiscal estimate, Tradeoffs.

Unknown: Named organizations.

Replaces the Constitution’s newspaper-publication requirement with publication for 60 days before a general election in the manner set by statute. The companion law would require the full text on the Utah Public Notice Website and Lieutenant Governor’s website. The change would take effect January 1, 2027.

YES

Adopt the new constitutional publication rule and trigger HB481’s corresponding change.

NO

Keep the current constitutional newspaper requirement.

Who benefits or is affected

State administrators would use the specified official websites to publish amendment text. The measure names no technology company for a contract.

Costs and tradeoffs

No bond, new tax or payment to voters is authorized; HB481 appropriates no money. Replacing paid newspaper notices could reduce publication spending. An independently verified total saving is not available in this guide, and publication savings would not produce an equal payment to every voter.

The Constitution retains the 60-day timing requirement while publication method moves to statute.

The companion law uses official websites in place of the newspaper requirement.

Organizations named in the records

Recipient names: unknown. No separately verified allocation or contract-award list is recorded for this question. This does not mean no recipients exist.

Published party positions

Democratic Party

Unknown — no verified statement is recorded for this question.

Republican Party

Unknown — no verified statement is recorded for this question.

A position applies to the named organization, not every party member. Missing evidence does not establish neutrality. We do not infer a party’s position from its ideology or a legislator’s vote.

STATEWIDE•Utah

Constitutional Amendment B

Require 60% approval for statewide citizen initiatives that increase taxes

Source review availableSee exactly what was checked

The fields listed below were checked against the linked sources on October 21, 2026. Future outcomes, final contract awards and individual tax bills are not established by this review.

Checked: Title, Summary, Yes vote, No vote, Beneficiaries, Fiscal estimate, Tradeoffs.

Unknown: Named organizations.

Raises the vote threshold for statewide citizen initiatives containing a new tax, an expanded tax base, a higher tax rate, or a property-tax rate that falls less than under existing law. Covered initiatives would need at least 60% rather than a simple majority. Other initiative rules, including the separate wildlife rule, remain.

YES

Adopt the higher threshold for the specified citizen-initiated tax changes.

NO

Keep the current simple-majority standard for these initiatives.

Who benefits or is affected

People and businesses that would pay a proposed tax gain stronger protection against its adoption through an initiative. Legislators retain their existing route to enact taxes, increasing their importance relative to citizen proponents. No named business receives a tax cut from this amendment alone.

Costs and tradeoffs

The amendment itself sets no tax rate, spending amount or bond authorization. Its fiscal effects depend on future initiatives that pass or fail under the different rule. A present-day per-voter saving cannot be calculated from that possibility.

Covered initiatives receiving a majority but less than 60% would fail.

The added threshold is in the statewide-initiative provision, not ordinary legislative tax bills.

Organizations named in the records

Recipient names: unknown. No separately verified allocation or contract-award list is recorded for this question. This does not mean no recipients exist.

Published party positions

Democratic Party

Unknown — no verified statement is recorded for this question.

Republican Party

Unknown — no verified statement is recorded for this question.

A position applies to the named organization, not every party member. Missing evidence does not establish neutrality. We do not infer a party’s position from its ideology or a legislator’s vote.

Official election office · Coverage status · Reporting standards